Revision under Article 226/227 dismissed where trial court barred plaintiff from re-leading evidence on fraud absent other witness appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 5818 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of decision: February 05, 2013
Darshan Singh and others
.. Petitioners
Vs.
Iqbal Singh
.. Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
A.N. Jindal, J
The petitioners have invoked the provisions of Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 3.8.2012 passed by the trial court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that except the defendant, none has appeared to prove the plea of fraud and misrepresentation. Therefore, in these circumstances the plaintiff, who has already appeared in the witness box, could not be permitted again to lead the evidence on that ground.
No merits.
Dismissed.
February 05, 2013 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
Darshan Singh and others
Iqbal Singh
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
