Appeal in RSA No. 309 of 1989 was dismissed as infructuous due to the likely retirement of the respondent, which extinguished the cause of action.
Limitation of invoking cause of action following retirement of original plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 309 of 1989 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.02.2013
Surinder Kumar
……Appellant
Versus
Dr. Shree Bhagwan and others
…….Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: None.
A.N. Jindal, J.
On perusal of the record, it appears that plaintiff-respondent No.1 must have been retired by now. Therefore, no cause of action survives
in this appeal.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
01.02.2013 ajp
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
Surinder Kumar
Dr. Shree Bhagwan
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
