The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition which was voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioners' counsel after a connected revision permitted the exhibition of an original agreement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2939 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.02.2013
Jatinder Singh and others
……Petitioners
Versus
Sher Singh and another
…….Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: Mr. Rakesh Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
A.N. Jindal, J.
Since connected Civil Revision No.2938 of 2012 titled as Jatinder Singh and others Vs. Sher Singh and others, has been allowed and the petitioners have been permitted to exhibit the original agreement, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the present petition and withdraws the same.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
05.02.2013 ajp
(A.N.Jindal) Judge
Jatinder Singh and others
Sher Singh and another
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
