In an affidavit, the petitioner extended an unconditional apology and vacated the tenanted premises, rendering the petition moot. The court treated the matter accordingly. Three queries regarding reporter access were posed but not addressed.
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
CR No.4512 of 2013
Date of decision: 02.08.2013
Subhash Autos
-----Petitioner(s)
Vs.
Baldev Singh Sunner & ors.
-----Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:Mr. Sanjay Tangri, Advocate for the petitioner. ---
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.
The petitioner is present in Court.
An affidavit has been filed on his behalf, wherein he
has tendered an unconditional apology and has further stated that
he has vacated the tenanted premises.
In view thereof, counsel for the petitioner does not
wish to press this petition.
Dismissed as not pressed.
August 02, 2013 ( RAKESH KUMAR GARG )
Kumar Ashwani 2013.08.05 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CR No. 4512 of 2013
2
ak
JUDGE
Kumar Ashwani 2013.08.05 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition tendering an unconditional apology and vacating the premises will be pressed
Whether the High Court should allow reporters to see the judgment
Whether the judgment can be reported in the Digest
Baldev Singh Sunner
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
