However, learned Senior Advocate Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, duly assisted by Mr.B.B.S. Randhawa, Advocate who appearing on behalf of the respondent5landlords, has supported the findings of the authorities below and has argued that both the grounds are proved against the petitioner. It has been further argued that the landlord is the best judge of his needs and the tenant cannot ask him to confine himself to the accommodation which he is having in his possession, and thus, the respondent5landlords cannot be asked to open the educational institution, as alleged by them, in the basement or on the other floors of the building, which have been got vacated during the pendency of the case in hand. According to learned counsel for the respondent5 landlords, once a specific plea has been raised on behalf of the landlords that they require the entire building, their petition for eviction against the petitioner cannot be rejected for the reason that they have got vacated other two floors of the building during the pendency of the proceedings. It has also been argued that it is for the respondent5 landlords to manage their agricultural land at Ferozepur and Faridkot while running the Coaching Centre/Educational Institution here at Chandigarh and it is none of the business of the petitioner5tenant to raise such an argument, which is not permissible to be raised.