The appeal was declared infructuous due to the efflux of time and was accordingly dismissed without detailed reasoning.
The appeal was dismissed as it had become infructuous by efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
FAO No.1747 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision: 1.8.2013
Joga Singh
-----Appellant(s)
Vs.
Election Tribunal, Gurdaspur & ors.
-----Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. H.S. Sethi, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
Mr. Vishal Garg, AAG, Punjab.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.
Counsel for the appellant states that the present
appeal has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Ordered accordingly.
August 01, 2013 [RAKESH KUMAR GARG] ak JUDGE
Kumar Ashwani 2013.08.02 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Joga Singh
Election Tribunal, Gurdaspur
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
