The High Court dismissed the petition challenging a trial court order allowing amendment of a written statement, finding no illegality or irregularity warranting interference.
Petition dismissed as no illegality detected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1920 of 2013 Date of decision: 21.03.2013
Murti Devi
……Petitioner
Versus
Sunita Devi
…….Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. JINDAL
Present: Mr. Ashwani Gaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
A.N. Jindal, J.
The order dated 04.02.2013 (Annexure P-5) passed by the trial
Court, allowing the application filed by the defendant-respondent for amendment of the written statement, is under challenge.
Having examined the impugned order, no illegality, much less irregularity, has been detected therein, warranting interference by this Court.
No merits.
Dismissed.
(A.N.Jindal)
21.03.2013 ajp
Judge
Murti Devi
Sunita Devi
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
