Sarabjit Kaur v. Ved Parkash and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition challenged an order where the trial Court treated cross-examination as nil. The High Court set aside the order, granted the petitioner one effective opportunity to cross-examine the witness, and allowed an adjournment contingent upon the petitioner paying Rs.10,000 as costs.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order set aside; one effective opportunity granted for cross-examination; petitioner awarded Rs.10,000 costs.