Petitioner challenged actions of Divisional Commissioner. Court disposed of petition as infructuous following Commissioner's decision, reserving rights for future adjudication by Consolidation Officer subject to potential challenge.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; rights to challenge Director Consolidation's order reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.11.16 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2335-2013 (O&M). Decided on: November 15, 2013.
Jagir Singh
..... Petitioner
Versus
Chander Parkash
..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Ashok Giri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.R.D.Sharma, DAG., Haryana.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
In view of the decision taken by the Divisional Commissioner, Rohtak on 20.6.1003, this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous without prejudice to the legal rights of the petitioner which are the subject matter of adjudication before the Consolidation Officer or any other Authority. It will be open to the petitioner to question the legality and propriety of the order of Director Consolidation.
(M.M.S. BEDI)
November 15, 2013. JUDGE rka
Jagir Singh
Chander Parkash
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
