This was a one-line order setting aside a civil petition on the submission by counsel that the petitioner, relying on a report by the Officers Committee, did not wish to press the petition.
Petition allowed on the submission of withdrawal/non-pressing based on an Officers Committee report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No. 2237 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.3.2013
Haroop Singh
.. Petitioner
v.
M. K. Tiwari
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. APS Mann, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Lerarned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the report dated 11.2.2013 submitted by the Officers Committee, he does not wish to press the present petition.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
14.3.2013
mk
Haroop Singh
M. K. Tiwari
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
