Single judge held that the petitioner's petition challenging a promotion denial order is rendered infructuous following a subordinate decision, with liberty to challenge that order if it violates rules.
Petition disposed as infructuous with liberty to challenge the underlying departmental order if violative of rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar Arora 2013.11.21 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-2006-2013 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-2006-2013 (O&M). Decided on: November 20, 2013.
Barjinder Kaur
..... Petitioner
Versus
Anjali Bhawra and another
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.Sawinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Haripal Verma, DAG., Punjab.
M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)
Claim of the petitioner to decide his legal notices dated 6.10.2012 and 21.11.2012 has been decided vide Annexure R1 finding the petitioner not eligible for promotion as Headmistress having not been able to earn requisite benchmark of 12. A copy of order dated 15.11.2013 considering the claim of the petitioner has been placed on record as Annexure R1.
Without expression of any opinion regarding validity of Annexure R1, this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the validity of Annexure R1, in case it is contrary to any instructions or rules of promotion.
(M.M.S. BEDI) November 20, 2013. JUDGE rka
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging a promotion eligibility decision has been rendered infructuous.
Barjinder Kaur
Anjali Bhawra and another
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
