The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition by directing respondents to reconsider the petitioners' claim in light of the judgment in Prem Kumar Verma vs. State of Haryana within four months.
Direction to respondents 1 to 3 to reconsider the claim of the petitioners within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. 13348 of 2011 Date of decision:- 19.11.2013
O P Verma and ors
Petitioner
vs.
Managing Director, UHVNNL and others
Respondent
Present: Mr. Madan Gopal Gupta, Advocate. Mr. SK Hooda, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Maini, Advocate for respondents 4 to 12.
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Counsel for both the parties are ad idem on the point that the claim of the petitioners and the private respondents deserves to be reconsidered in the light of judgment in Prem Kumar Verma & others vs.
State of Haryana (CWP 17280 of 2011 decided on 7.8.2012).
This petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents 1 to 3 to reconsider the claim of the petitioners and the private respondents in the light of the above said judgment, within a period of four months after the receipt of a certified copy of this order.
November 19 ,2013 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
Mann Tapindar Singh 2013.11.22 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prem Kumar Verma & others vs. State of HaryanaRelied on¶10
Prem Kumar Verma & others vs. State of Haryana (CWP 17280 of 2011 decided on 7.8.2012)
O P Verma and ors
Managing Director, UHVNNL
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
