A petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the State acknowledged compliance with a previous order, leading the petitioner to seek withdrawal of the current filing.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kumar Vinod 2013.07.04 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1462 of 2013 Date of decision:04.07.2013
Ranbir Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Hardeep Kumar and others ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
Mr. Sourav Mohunta, DAG, Haryana, puts in appearance on behalf of the State and states that the order dated 12.09.2012 passed by this Court has been complied with.
In view thereof, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal
of the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
July 04, 2013 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
Ranbir Singh
Sh. Hardeep Kumar and others
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
