Referenced judgment in Crl.A. No.121-DB of 2009; allowed appeal in part by reference.
Allowed in part; see consequential order Dinesh Kumar vs. State of Haryana.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.A. No.228-DB of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: JULY 3, 2013
BHAGAT SINGH & ORS.
...APPELLANTS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA
...RESPONDENT
CORAM:HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL. HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY.
PRESENT: MR.R.S. RAI, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR.D.S. BRAR, ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT.
MR.DHRUV DAYAL, DAG, HARYANA.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Kumar vs. State of Haryana , decided on 3.7.2013.
(M.JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
July 3, 2013 (ANITA CHAUDHRY) Gulati JUDGE
Bhagat Singh & Ors.
State of Haryana
M. Jeyapaul
Anita Chaudhry
Gulati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
