Regular second appeal dismissed as infructuous due to possession taken by the respondent in execution. No substantive decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 1176 of 2011 (O & M) DATE OF DECISION: March 02, 2012
Budhi Singh and another
.........APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
M/s. Holiday Home Society
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Y.P. Singh, Advocate, for the appellants.
G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the appellants contends that the appeal has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that possession has been taken by the plaintiff-respondent in execution.
Accordingly, the present regular second appeal is dismissed having been rendered infructous.
02.03.2012 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE
Budhi Singh and another
M/s. Holiday Home Society
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
