On 17 October 2012, a single judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a civil writ petition as infructuous because the result in the underlying case had already been declared and would have effect.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 8785 of 2005
Jasmohinder Singh Grewal
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Panjab University and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. B.L. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Mr. Gupta appearing for the University says that the result, in this case, has been declared. The same, accordingly, will have effect. The present writ petition, accordingly, is rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
October 17, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE
Jasmohinder Singh Grewal
Panjab University
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
