Partly allowed
Srishti Bajaj and Anr. v. U.T. Chandigarh and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/33236/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners, minors claiming to be majors who entered a love marriage against parental wishes, approached the Court seeking protection. The Court issued interim directions protecting their lives and liberty and restraining specific respondents from interference, without adjudging on the validity of the marriage.
What did the court decide?
Directed Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to protect petitioners' lives and liberty; restrained Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 from interfering.