In a criminal miscellaneous petition regarding bail, the Court held that no case for bail emerged at this stage of the trial. Evidence recording was fixed for 22.10.2012.
dismissal of the petition; case adjourned for recording of remaining evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.25061 of 2012 Date of Decision: October 16, 2012
Mandeep Singh @ Deepa
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Ms.Asha Thakur, Advocate, for Mr.Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.B.B.S.Teji, Addl.A.G.Punjab, for the State.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Out of 26 total witnesses, 7 have already been examined. Eight witnesses have been given up. The case is now fixed for recording the remaining prosecution evidence on 22.10.2012. Let the prosecution make efforts to examine the remaining evidence on the said date or on a short date to be given thereafter. No case for grant of bail at this stage is made out.
Dismissed.
October 16, 2012 ramesh
( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in the present stage of the trial.
Whether remaining prosecution evidence can be recorded on the fixed date.
Whether the judgment requires to be allowed to reporters.
Mandeep Singh @ Deepa
State of Punjab
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
