A single judge dismissed a writ petition filed by Anganwadi Workers as not maintainable, relying on the Supreme Court decision in State of Karnataka vs. Ameerbi and others, without allowing the case for being reported.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
C.W.P. No.8155 of 1997
Date of decision:11.1.2012
Rajinder Kaur and others
..Petitioners
Versus
The State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina
Present: Mr.C.M.Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.P.Verma, Addl.A.G.Punjab for the respondents .
Rajiv Narain Raina,J
Mr. H.P.Verma, Addl. A.G. Punjab has pointed out that the instant
writ petition is not maintainable by an Anganwadi Worker in view of the law laid
down in State of Karnataka and others vs. Ameerbi and others (2007)11 Supreme Court Cases 681. .
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as
not maintainable.
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA)
JUDGE
January 11,2012 nk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable by an Anganwadi Worker as per the law laid down in State of Karnataka vs. Ameerbi and others.
Whether the instant writ petition should be reported or included in the digest.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Karnataka and others vs. Ameerbi and othersRelied on¶15
State of Karnataka and others vs. Ameerbi and others (2007)11 Supreme Court Cases 681
Rajinder Kaur and others
The State of Punjab and others
Rajiv Narain Raina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
