petitioner has approached this Court through this petition. The petitioner has relied upon the written statement filed by the State in CWP No. 7333 of 1992 'Jagjit Singh & another vs. The State of Punjab & others' in which in para 6 it was stated that the present petitioner and one Mumta Bhatt were found suitable for appointment by the Departmental Selection Committee. She has placed that written statement on record as Annexure P-3. The final decision in CWP No. 7333 of 1992 ' Jagjit Singh & another v. the State of Punjab & others ' stands reported in 1993(2) RSJ 692. Her name is mentioned in the judgment as a person recommended for appointment. 2. On notice of motion being issued respondents put in appearance and filed written statement. The stand of the respondent-State is that the petitioner's name was recommended in the waiting list of physically handicapped (blind) candidates. Three posts had been earmarked for this special category. However, three posts were filled in accordance with the directions of this Court in CWP No. 17444 of 1991 and the aforesaid CWP No. 7333 of 1992. In these circumstances, the petitioner's name could not be considered by the Government as the vacancies meant for the special quota were already filled up on the directions of this Court. The directions in the aforesaid two cases were complied with by issuing appointment letters against the reserved posts of blind candidates from the waiting list and the quota stood consumed. There was, therefore, no substantive vacancy against which the claim of the petitioner could be considered. In para 7 of the reply on merits, the respondents have recounted the manner in which 300 requisitioned posts of different categories were filled up.
