Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition after the Settlement Commission adjudicated the underlying matter. The Court held the petition become infructuous and ordered its disposal accordingly.
Order dated August 28, 2012: Petition disposed of as infructuous due to adjudication by the Settlement Commission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.5229 of 2008 (O & M) Date of Decision: August 28, 2012
Ajay Kumar Aggarwal
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Asstt. Solicitor General for Union of India.
Mr. Tajinder Joshi, Advocate, for the revenue.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, the Settlement Commission has adjudicated the matter on merits, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
August 28, 2012 Sukhpreet
Ajay Kumar Aggarwal
Union of India
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
