Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars, disposed of by single judge.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.2277 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:27.08.2012
M/s A& M Advertising and Marketing
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Gagandeep Wasu, Addl.AG, Haryana Mr.Vinod S.Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Babbar Bhan, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent developments, he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action, with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
( Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
27.08.2012 ( G.S.Sandhawalia ) sd Judge
M/s A& M Advertising and Marketing
State of Haryana
Another Respondent
Third Respondent
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
