Petitioner were allowed to withdraw the PIL as it was disposed of in a connected civil writ petition decided on the same date.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition and same dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.846 of 2012 Date of decision:27.08.2012
M/s Absolute Impact & Retail Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
Anil Mehta and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral)
In view of the order passed in CWP No.2952 of 2012 titled as
“ M/s Absolute Impact & Retail Pvt. Ltd . Vs. State of Haryana and
others ” passed by this Court of even date, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed.
( Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
27.08.2012 ( G.S.Sandhawalia ) sd Judge
M/s Absolute Impact & Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Anil Mehta and others
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
