The court held that a writ petition filed by the petitioner became infructuous as the Income Tax Settlement Commission granted relief on merits during the pendency. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3911 of 2008 (O & M) Date of Decision: September 27, 2012
Sain Dass Mahajan, HUF, through Narinder Mahajan
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India and another
.... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Assistant Solicitor General, with Ms. Sonika Kapadia, Advocate, for UOI.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, Income Tax Settlement Commission has granted the relief by deciding the application for settlement on merits in favour of the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition has
been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
September 27, 2012 Sukhpreet
(G. S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
Sain Dass Mahajan, HUF
Union of India
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G. S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
