This was an infructuous writ petition where counsel for both parties agreed that the relief claimed had already been granted to the petitioner, leading to the disposal of the petition by treat rendering it infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11908 of 2012 Date of Decision:- September 26, 2012
M/s. Raja Enterprises
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Punjab and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Kumar Vishav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the relief claimed in this petition has since been granted to the petitioner and, therefore, the petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 26.09.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
M/s. Raja Enterprises
State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
