Petitioner's writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without any substantive legal ruling or discussion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3807 of 2004 Date of Decision:- September 04, 2012
M/s. Mark Medicines (P) Ltd.
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
The State of Haryana and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition may
be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
04.09.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
M/s. Mark Medicines (P) Ltd.
The State of Haryana
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
