Ved Prakash & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged the quashing of summons issued by authorities. The Court held that the grievance should first be raised via a representation to the respondent.
What did the court decide?
The petition disposed of with liberty to first approach the appropriate authority by filing a representation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 17174 of 2012 Date of Decision:- September 04, 2012
Ved Prakash and others
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The grievance raised in this petition is for quashing of proclamation notices dated 13.08.2012 (Annexures P-2 and P-3) issued by respondent no. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners admitted that the writ petition has been filed without first approaching the respondents by raising the grievance as raised in this writ petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the propriety of the grievance of the petitioner is a fit case for a writ petition as legal recourse is otherwise available.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ved Prakash
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Ajay Kumar Mittal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/17174/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court