The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed withdrawal of a writ petition and application, dismissing them as withdrawn, pending filing of a fresh petition with better particulars.
Allowed withdrawal; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 12310 of 2012 in/and CWP No. 15256 of 2012 Date of Decision:- September 04, 2012
M/s. IAA Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. and another
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
The Authorized Officer, UCO Bank and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:- Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, and Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the caveator.
Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate, for the applicant (in C.M. No. 12310 of 2012).
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners and the applicant state that they may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition and the application and be allowed to file fresh one by furnishing the better particulars on the same cause of action.
Allowed to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 04.09.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
M/s. IAA Hospitals Pvt. Ltd.
The Authorized Officer, UCO Bank
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
