Petitioner withdrew this writ petition with liberty to avail alternative legal remedies. The court dismissed the petition.
Petitioner was granted liberty to take recourse to other legal remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3349 of 2012 (O & M)
Date of Decision: September 13, 2012
Shingara Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
Punjab & Sind Bank and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. K.S. Rekhi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. A.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the respondents. ********
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The prayer in this writ petition is that the directions be issued to the respondents to either deliver the possession of the properties as detailed in Para 2 of the writ petition or to return the price of the same deposited by the petitioner along with interest @12% per annum from the date of deposit till its realization.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
September 13, 2012 (G. S. SANDHAWALIA) Sukhpreet JUDGE
Shingara Singh
Punjab & Sind Bank
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
