The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted consent to the adjournment order filed by counsel for the petitioner, citing the Income Tax Settlement Commission's granting of relief during pendency which rendered the writ petition infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous due to Settlement Commission relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3652 of 2008 Date of Decision:- September 12, 2012
Smt. Poonam Mittal
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
Union of India and another
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:- Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Assistant Solicitor General,
with Ms. Sonika Kapadia, Advocate,
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the writ petition, Income Tax Settlement Commission has granted the relief by deciding the application for settlement on merits in favour of the petitioner and, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 12.09.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
Poonam Mittal
Union of India
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
