with a sanctioned load of 74.920 KW is in the name of Gulshan Bajaj. The electric meter of the petitioner was checked by XEN Enforcement-I, PSEB, Ludhiana on 20.6.2001 and a note was given that there is a generator installed in the premises of Account No. JM15/27 which is common with Account No. JM15/26. Further, the electric supply in two rooms on first floor of Account No. JM15/27 was running from Account No. JM15/26 and that the partition wall between the two premises was approximately 5 feet high. On the basis of the checking report, two notices were issued to the petitioner for clubbing both the electricity connections. The petitioner made a representation to the XEN clarifying that these two premises were separate and the two electricity connections were not clubbable. A committee was constituted which gave a finding that the connection of the petitioner was clubbable. The petitioner submitted a representation to the Chairman for constituting another clubbing committee. The said committee vide report dated 22.8.2003 held that there was no conclusive proof of the intermixing of the loads by the petitioner. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner moved a representation dated 22.8.2003 to the Chairman of the respondentBoard for withdrawal of the order of penalty and for granting personal hearing. When the respondent-Board failed to withdraw the penalty order, the petitioner approached the Disputes Settlement Authority (in short “the DSA”) for quashing of the order imposing penalty. The DSA vide order dated 16.1.2006 held the petitioner liable to to pay clubbing charges from 28.11.2000 to 22.8.2003. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Board Level Review Committee. However, during the pendency of the appeal, a supplementary bill dated
