The petitioner failed to appear on the last date of hearing. The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 2096 of 1994 Date of Decision: 06.07.2012
Kulbhushan
............ Petitioner
V.
State of Haryana & others
.......... Respondents
CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. NAGRATH
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Kundu, Addl. AG, Haryana. for respondent No. 1 to 3
Mr. Rajesh Arora, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
R.P. NAGRATH, J. (ORAL)
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Record of the case shows that even on the last date of hearing none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It is already 3.15 p.m.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
July 6, 2012 ( R.P. NAGRATH ) jk JUDGE
Kulbhushan
State of Haryana
R.P. NAGRATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
