The High Court held that the Constitutional Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. The petition was dismissed accordingly without detailed reasoning or precedent analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.1727 of 1994 Date of decision:09.05.2012
Umed Singh .....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.R.A.Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioner,
Ms.Aakanksha Sawhney, DAG, Haryana.
G.S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has been
rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
09.05.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
Umed Singh
State of Haryana
G.S.Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
