The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the Writ Petition as it was filed ex parte without representation from the petitioner, resulting in a decision by default.
Present writ petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11015 of 1994 Date of decision:07.05.2012
B.M.Sharma .....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Haryana & another .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioners,
Ms.Aakanksha Sawhney, DAG, Haryana.
G .S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in default.
09.05.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
B.M.Sharma
The State of Haryana
G.S.Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
