Sumit Arora v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P.No.16690 of 2012 Date of Decision:- 29.08.2012
Sumit Arora
....Petitioner(s)
vs.
State of Haryana and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Present:Mr.Jagjit Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the case for some time,
prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
August 29, 2012 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) poonam JUDGE
Sumit Arora
State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court