The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Bikram Singh and others as it was presented for non-prosecution, with no appearance by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.1697 of 2004 Date of Decision:28.8.2012
Bikram Singh and others
......Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union Territory of Chandigarh and others
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: None for the petitioners.
HEMANT GUPTA, J.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners in spite of letter issued to learned counsel for the petitioners having been received back duly served.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
( HEMANT GUPTA ) JUDGE
( RAJIV NARAIN RAINA ) JUDGE
28.8.2012 rajeev
Bikram Singh and others
Union Territory of Chandigarh and others
Hemant Gupta
Rajiv Narain Raina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
