The court dismissed a civil writ petition as infructuous based on the representation made by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 15732 of 2001
Satish Kumar
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Appellate Authority under the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act etc. and others ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Ms. Neha Maan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Abha Sood, Advocate for Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No. 2
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ
petition has been rendered infructuous.
On the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, the
writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
October 08, 2012
reena
( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
Satish Kumar
Appellate Authority under the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act etc.
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
