Writ petition challenging reversion order dismissed as infructuous because petitioners retired from service prior to decision.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No.15493 of 1994
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.15493 of 1994 Date of decision:25.07.2012
Surjit Singh and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
The State of Punjab & others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate for the petitioners,
Mr. Vijay Kumar Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for respondents.
G.S.Sandhawalia J. (Oral)
2
CWP No.15493 of 1994
against the said posts, the State shall not take any adverse action to recover/reduce the same as it will be highly inequitable to do so once the petitioners had worked on the said posts for 17 years.
25.07.2012 Pka
(G.S.Sandhawalia) JUDGE
Surjit Singh and others
The State of Punjab
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
