In an original writ petition, the Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a matter concerning the suspension of the petitioner as Sarpanch. The court held that no interference was needed pending the ongoing enquiry and directed respondents to expedite the process.
Direction to expedite enquiry within two months and associate the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 1535 of 2012
Date of Decision: 14.2.2012
Sunil Kumar
……… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & another
………… Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.
respondents. Copy of the petition has been supplied to her in the Court. The service on the respondents is waived.
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) Judge
14.2.2012 ‘sp’
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension order of the petitioner as Sarpanch requires interim relief pending enquiry.
Sunil Kumar
State of Haryana
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
