petitioners seeking protection from private respondents invoked section 482 CrPC. the court allowed the application directing the Commissioner of Police to act on the complaint and safeguard the petitioners lives.
direction to Commissioner of Police to take action on the complaint and ensure no harm is caused to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.Misc.No. 9239 of 2012 and Crl.Misc.No.M-4321 of 2012.
1
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No. 9239 of 2012 and Crl.Misc.No.M-4321 of 2012. Date of Decision:- 14.02.2012.
Sunil and another
Petitioners.
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
Crl.Misc.No.9239 of 2012
Criminal Miscellaneous Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.Misc.No.M-4321 of 2012.
Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C., is for the issuance of direction to respondents No. 2 to 4 to protect lives and liberty of the petitioners from respondents No.5 to 8. The petitioners contend that they being major, have solemnized their marriage in accordance with law. They further submit that the private
Crl.Misc.No. 9239 of 2012 and Crl.Misc.No.M-4321 of 2012. 2
respondents are not accepting the marriage of the petitioners and adamant to separate the petitioners from each other by resorting to illegal means. They further submit that in view of the imminent danger to their lives and liberty they have already moved a representation (Annexure P-7) before the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar.
Without going deep into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to take action, as warranted by law, on the complaint (Annexure P-7) and in the meantime, issue necessary orders to ensure that no harm is caused to the lives and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
14.02.2012 Anoop
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to directions for protection of their lives and liberty against private respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil and another
State of Punjab and others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
