The High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that a settlement had been arrived at between the parties on July 19, 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 13030 of 2012 DATE OF DECISION: July 19, 2012
M/s. Thind Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd.
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State Bank of Patiala and others
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Vinod Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does
not wish to pursue the present writ petition as some settlement has been arrived at between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 19.07.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
M/s. Thind Agro Foods Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of Patiala and others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
