The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition grounded on an amicable settlement between parties via a commercial mazismr application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC and Section 151 CPC.
Col. mazismr disposed as stew y wz the retirement of>nwr >wc.;uwa; y wrt petitiom au cm.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11992 of 2012 (O & M) Date of Decision:- August 31, 2012
M/s. Aman and Company
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
Union of India and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. R. Kartikya, Advocate, for the respondents.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
C.M. No. 12062 of 2012
The application has been filed under Order 23, Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC and Rule 32 Writ Jurisdiction (Punjab and Haryana) Rules, 1976 for withdrawal of the main writ petition on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.
In view of the above, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the
writ petition.
C.M. stands disposed of.
CWP No. 11992 of 2012
In view of order of even date passed in C.M. No. 12062 of 2012, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 31.08.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a commercial court writ petition can be withdrawn on terms of amicable settlement?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M/s. Aman and Company
Union of India
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
