In a public interest litigation, the High Court dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner failed to file an amended petition after seeking an adjournment in 2008, indicating lack of interest.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.11983 of 2008 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: October 05, 2012
Sis Pal Saini
…..Petitioner
versus
Maharashi Dayanand University Rohtak and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, JUDGE
Present: None for the petitioner
A.K. SIKRI, C.J. : (Oral)
On July 15, 2008, counsel for the petitioner had sought adjournment to enable him to file amended writ petition. Till date, needful is not done. This is a public interest litigation. From the aforesaid, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed.
( A.K. SIKRI ) CHIEF JUSTICE
October 05, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) pc JUDGE
Sis Pal Saini
Maharashi Dayanand University Rohtak and others
A.K. Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
