The Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation noting that the petitioner had failed to produce tender terms and showed no interest in pursuing the petition over twelve years.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.11868 of 2007 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: October 05, 2012
Rashpal Singh
…..Petitioner
versus
Managing Director, Markfed and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, JUDGE
Present: None for the petitioner
A.K. SIKRI, C.J. : (Oral)
On August 06, 2007, counsel for the petitioner had sought adjournment to enable him to produce the terms and conditions of the tender in question. Till date, needful is not done. This is a public interest litigation. From the aforesaid, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed.
( A.K. SIKRI ) CHIEF JUSTICE
October 05, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) pc JUDGE
Rashpal Singh
Managing Director, Markfed
A.K. Sikri
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
