Single justice dismissed this writ petition for non-compliance with court directions and absence of petitioner's representation, noting the petitioner failed to file a required affidavit by the Advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 11010 of 2004 Date of decision September 10, 2012
Rameshwar Dayal
....... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
........ Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. D. D. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
K. Kannan, J (oral).
ajournment to file an affidavit of the Advocate in support of the petitioner's case. There has been no compliance of the directions given by this Court. There is also no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
grounds mentioned above.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
September 10, 2012 archana
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be maintained given the petitioner's failure to comply with court directions.
Whether the writ petition ought to be dismissed due to lack of representation and non-compliance by the petitioner.
Rameshwar Dayal
State of Haryana
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
