Civil Revision petition dismissed by a single judge as it became infructuous due to the respondent's submission of a compromise agreement and the petitioner's surrender of the property, rendering the petition futile.
Petitioner at liberty to approach this Court if the genuineness of the document produced by the respondent is disputed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.2901 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision:10.09.2012.
Dharamvir son of Milkhi Ram, resident of Ramgarhia Gurdwara Road, Phagwara.
...Petitioner
versus
Madan Mohan son of Shri Kundan Lal Dhalla, c/o Dhalla Auto Works, Ramgarhia Gurdwara Road, Phagwara.
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sudhir Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent.
K.Kannan, J. (Oral)
The counsel for the respondent states that the petitionertenant has surrendered the property and also files before this Court a photocopy of compromise effected between parties. There is no representation for the petitioner. The document filed in Court is taken on record as vouching for the submissions made by the counsel for the respondent. Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court if the genuineness of the document produced by the respondent is disputed.
(K.KANNAN) JUDGE
10.09.2012 sanjeev
Dharamvir
Madan Mohan
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
