In a case where the petitioner applied to withdraw the criminal writ petition, the High Court allowed the withdrawal as prayed for.
The withdrawal of the present petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal WP No. 579 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2012
Monu
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
.........Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. Chander Hans Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. J S Rattu, DAG, Haryana for the respondent State
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Application (CRM W 376 of 2012) is allowed as prayed for.
Main case
Reply on behalf of respondent State has been been filed in Court today. The same is taken on record.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition. Ordered accordingly.
mohan
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
18.05.2012
Monu
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
