The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. upon being informed that the petitioner did not wish to proceed further with the application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-10597 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 17, 2012
Mohit
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.HPS Aulakh, Advocate for the petitioner.
.......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.21780 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-10597 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.79, dated 19.3.2012, under Sections 498-A/406 IPC, registered at Police Station City Taran Taran, District Taran Taran, Punjab.
It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that he does not want to proceed further with this petition and the same may be dismissed as such.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
17.5.2012
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohit
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
