Petitioners withdrew their petition with liberty to raise pleas before the trial Court, where the case was fixed for final arguments.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise pleas before the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.M-14032 of 2011 Date of Decision:18.5.2012
Satya Devi and others
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Jasmer Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, D.A.G. Haryana. Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for respondent No.2.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned State counsel has pointed out that now the case before
the trial Court is fixed for final arguments.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the present with liberty to raise all the pleas before the trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
18.5.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Satya Devi and others
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
