The petitioner withdrew a continuing review application before this Court, seeking liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
Withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No. 4036 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 17, 2012
Hardev Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
December 17, 2012 PKapoor
Hardev Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
